X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20151002103552.26610.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:35:52 +0200
From:	"Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<0788cca443ca40a88d6e21f1a216a759 AT net2air DOT co> <560D81CE DOT 1010800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012211 DOT t91MBXPI025587 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3705430D-86F7-45ED-AB09-4F9F737C8000 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <201510020536 DOT t925a5PK017417 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201510020536.t925a5PK017417@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie wrote:
> We used to have just one list.

I think this is the only good approach.


> The non-devs wanted the dev talk moved.

And I think it's important for devs to listen to this, and move.

Obviously not to another list, but to something suitable for dev talk.


> You refer to "the developer mailing list" as if it's some magic land

Do you understand that its mere existence turns it into one?


> We can't win.

Yes, but you have to want to.


> Just because the project is open source does not mean that everyone
> has a right to be on every mailing list.

Yes, it does actually.


> There are some topics that are too trivial to warrant scrutiny
> (minor server issues) and some that should not be public for
> privacy issues ("people problems").

I think neither of those belong on a mailing list.


//Peter

- Raw text -