X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20150914214146.7993.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:41:46 +0200
From:	"Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Apollon
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20150913140631 DOT 1da1b78d AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <201509131529 DOT t8DFTUVS022118 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150914175929 DOT 22829 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <074A28AA-547E-4B71-8D81-30D2CB1B74F3 AT noqsi DOT com> <20150914231916 DOT e7114b46b8863378d85e1272 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20150914231916.e7114b46b8863378d85e1272@gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I also do book keeping and there numbers must add up exactly.
..
> These issues should probably only matter if current number is used
> to calculate next number instead of using an absolute value. For
> example if an object is rotated with angular transformation of
> current coordinates over and over again.

The issues matter because of usability.

Is there any other solution than double-entry in this case, to have
both a closed internal representation which can be rasterized at
arbitrary resolutions, plotted as gerber/ps *and* a closed system
for user input<->output ?

As a bonus, double-entry would allow internal consistency checks to
some degree.

Yes, it's a lot of work.


//Peter

- Raw text -