X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=oknvdqq7l4gG+2rWdCKQLOc4uT9JufXavzvLtBx6moc=;
	b=JMUayVITLf9LTOncz4xn78vtztxV2Lh8T38GtS6aU/sMUAJdk44SLSQQ2w92tZCpNY
	uf1umzWLZkER/G7h6g0GGN3fj7cHuH0QYf11FSbfgJu+/AjwIO7UrxCc9zJ4S/Qsixp6
	2DEuzqsIHZIBHMF+ClK+SJ88EsdSy7gyDOfLyHaBQ89bWHkNV3DVCjjpJai1ZRIxODH5
	p/hTQ/koZrgmhM7f+jKHkm1eaUIBf0M/8l+hoLb8RjAaErl8yIBBIr7sriOKCY1RSKcM
	Mu9rlZlTx2ClacKVBbQ6VgtyLVEAix6UExvfj0qIK08aeKOKUpEiq+5T/c+8sS/pCkmm
	zPOw==
X-Received:	by 10.194.120.70 with SMTP id la6mr3152896wjb.110.1442178288468;
	Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:04:46 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Apollon
Message-Id:	<20150913230446.580ef9269f52c0c73bd62971@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<B03281A2-123E-4F54-B3AA-CB8CCB09F1B1@noqsi.com>
References:	<20150913140631 DOT 1da1b78d AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<201509131529 DOT t8DFTUVS022118 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<B0EDB76E-F0DE-4A05-97FC-A405489ACA5A AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201509131824 DOT t8DIOCBc028428 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<B03281A2-123E-4F54-B3AA-CB8CCB09F1B1 AT noqsi DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:31:57 -0600
John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 13, 2015, at 12:24 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> >> If you do this right, you wind up with *exact* knowledge of every
> >> point in the x/y Cartesian geometry. Sines and cosines of these
> >> angles are rational numbers. No roundoff error. You can choose any
> >> unit basis you want (I'd go with meters).
> > 
> > I thought of this for arcs - define the endpoints and the radius, not
> > the center and angles (there are other issues in this example, but
> > still).  You're limited to what snaps to your grid, but if your grid
> > is nanometers that's a very small error.
> > 
> > You do tend to go off-angle pretty quickly though, since so many
> > angles result in irrational numbers.
> > 
> 
> What I meant to say is that the rational number solution is gridless. It has a base unit, but you can have coordinates like 45634/1299709.

It actually sound good if it could be implemented with a reasonable effort in practice.

- Raw text -