| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:47:21 +0200 (CEST) |
| X-X-Sender: | igor2 AT igor2priv |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Debug: | to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" |
| From: | gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu |
| Subject: | [geda-user] gschem bugreport: groff |
| Message-ID: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1509080943400.6924@igor2priv> |
| User-Agent: | Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Hi all, I was trying to compile gschem on a system that didn't have groff installed. ./configure did not quit and at the end generated all files, so I didn't notice it'd be a problem. When make reached gschem/, it stopped with an error that groff was not installed. I installed groff and rerun make but it kept on failing until I reran ./configure. I think if groff is essential for making gschem and change in groff installation requires a rerunning ./configure, then a missing groff should be a fatal error during configuration. Else we could just notice the user that some documentation couldn't be compiled and go on compiling the rest. Regards, Igor2
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |