X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=oHkh7mFhQZS0Taru+rx16vYO1mmZZ4+SeJ6FqKdA7u4=;
	b=qUxSAhyl91/7sKf/nqyC5+3ohBWWH11fyUI89gypn4RkwQBSF9IPA+7G/euYhQILai
	RGcm/dEi2dy4k7+F4ySrL50Ccd5E4dB6pGTpj+ckbK9YmfWZg5BMv1JX0//OAj10MyB5
	zk1fcLSNUMc9iRIQRTrGZTvo9gZs2fycfrYi+PlFuyI6fjKvFvxUg9ZFkt5PBafRhkos
	HM98pqdjIiP6aV64E6mCKVBS4FzqeR0GVaQv1W76lgIriL3EohFT0nz29XwYCBLOJ384
	Hx9QqkaIW/9eq1nC2E2i6hlzhXZzJiiYN0AjAKI5fA1QzPDOaXuyQVC7Ac6vosJ4xuir
	93KA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.64.7 with SMTP id k7mr13332001lbs.31.1441153246877; Tue,
	01 Sep 2015 17:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<1441151947.12067.57.camel@benjamin-hp-g70>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509010447310 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhRxevpXzeQpOV-OMtRhofjeSQxMkr0iFsutZ0a2EX9rcQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509010743560 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhSs=o0OT9AcWp9rfd=MRRxT3r5uyDa6VBcT66fXkEituw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55E5A6BA DOT 4030606 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201509011657 DOT t81Gve9d017777 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<1441151947 DOT 12067 DOT 57 DOT camel AT benjamin-hp-g70>
Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2015 00:20:46 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhQq9c4KFU_CUB12RpT5aVJ_4AaHRvD59NFcRSzKKdqBPw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gCode output
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Benjamin L. Naber
(benjamin AT project23d DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> So I'm curious, under what standard was the gCode generator built?
>
> Having experimented with a handful of EDA gcode generators, every single
> one outputs a different style of gcode. And, too add to this mess, every
> single CAM and machine controller responds differently to gcode styles.

I don't know. I have a CNC at work but I have never thought about
using it to cut boards.

> This is very annoying.
>
> I also notice that no one sticks to a standard of something such as
> turning on a spindle, specifying speed, and so on.

Speeds and feeds are changed with the type of material being cut and
the tool used. The machine is also a factor.

> Where are the options to adjust the output of the gcode, so the gcode
> output from PCB editor can produce something useful, and not having to
> go through yet another damn program in the toolchain to generate a PCB
> from a pretty picture on the screen?
>
> ~Benjamin
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -