X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:05:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: off-topic: daydreaming about modularization (was: Re: [geda-user]
	Buttons for automation (obligatory grab at our shared 3rd rail) Re: [geda-user]
	Antifork)
In-Reply-To:	<3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C@noqsi.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1508251403030.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<CAM2RGhTJ-gywb3LrkKoNKUxkwJCTsJ7vRxiLtmrXa5Mnp0331w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <DUB125-W46D6798DBF674B80F24208C6620 AT phx DOT gbl> <6B8DDCCF-0E84-43DC-94A3-89CE0E56F0ED AT noqsi DOT com> <201508242052 DOT 28189 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508250534570 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C AT noqsi DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, John Doty wrote:

>
> On Aug 24, 2015, at 11:56 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>
>>  The drive is low too: even with the clumsy modelling John likes to keep bashing pcb for, it works surprisingly well in practice.
>
> I think part of our problem is that if pcb makes sense to you, gschem does not, and vice-versa.

Can't remember where I said gschem didn't make sense to me... To me both 
of them make a lot of sense, and I see the shortcomings of both. I don't 
think gschem is perfect, either.

- Raw text -