| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Message-ID: | <55D2F512.6050005@envinsci.co.uk> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:04:18 +0100 |
| From: | "Matt Rhys-Roberts (matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
| Organization: | Envin Scientific Ltd. |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | gEDA User List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
| Subject: | [geda-user] my confusion re differing pad numbers and names (pcb) |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
I've created a symbol with 13 pads in pcb, and it seems to convert to an
element quite well.
After converting it to an element, I notice (by pressing D while
hovering over them) that the 13 pads are numbered arbitrarily, probably
in order of creation.
I can assign each pad with the preferred names/numbers to match the pad
naming convention for my design, but I don't know if this is going to
confuse matters later? Hopefully gsch2pcb will sort things out?
Should I edit the footprint file to make the initial ("wrong") pad
numbers match the desired pad numbering? Am I worrying too much?!
Thanks,
Matt.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |