| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
| d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
| h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
| :content-type; | |
| bh=uNcDDCQBKXouxrXBi6QJIC0/v6H3hR19SgpuvYbuYaE=; | |
| b=gUXhIVUyJl6fYITrNN2Xb4yKD1os3h8Zo7to5UwIS/tz3yZVHk9WRry0lqmvDeGj5z | |
| CcSm45l+smPjEmtcOThLlMG5ZrYxod3lAqh0y6YphVMaYIYm74ijB/AGsUeJq+WIb7LV | |
| EbwSUkdlUaSaFT2RaS3KIQyG5rTDZHTZy79ovmwDmXwIfaRHxpnWiLFqEzVwYZHdLTrb | |
| gKsVDqkCuxgTJBQU0js1YwsX6et0/oOBVI1PQCpZ6Y8JeXq3DNDKklzQZCM0jxbVYju6 | |
| b02yUFpZhpNhyLcxeKcxS+CFIxruVPHHwjmnbkaDFXyjgZXg2IHUd2XazBPdXK6x+ryI | |
| XItw== | |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Received: | by 10.194.89.5 with SMTP id bk5mr37803345wjb.144.1438624501865; |
| Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:55:01 -0700 (PDT) | |
| In-Reply-To: | <818820A7-34E1-4EE3-B043-992FA380ED01@sbcglobal.net> |
| References: | <818820A7-34E1-4EE3-B043-992FA380ED01 AT sbcglobal DOT net> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:55:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID: | <CAC4O8c8L47MHmH7CYYhp_1_VeimBTx6xsJUju6uV8NGeYvhPsg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Find Text Mechanism |
| From: | "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > I'd like to update the find text operation to support globs instead of just a substring search. > > Should the program support both globs and substring searches and have an additional checkbox in the find text window? Or, would users be fine with only the glob search? > > I'd like to only support globs from the angle that we don't get to many checkboxes in the UI. The drawback from only supporting globs, the '*' and '?' can't be escaped. This could be problematic when searching for that R? refdes that you forgot to set :) Britton
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |