X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From:	paubert AT iram DOT es
Date:	Sun, 2 Aug 2015 23:22:29 +0200
From:	"Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Improved Find
Message-ID:	<20150802212228.GA17264@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<FF2A0FBC-75B1-4A3E-9588-CD3DB7CC448A AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<5329D15C-0713-4919-8205-AC474BAC5652 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_bRzahs66fCYsuNggvuwy0-JxGbTu8EJsGwaeSVB8G-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<FFA87469-7432-49C7-8AF5-153C41DFE78F AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<CAC4O8c9241Z8A6-kKTQM6f=CTxtTU_-Dmj9uMOqqmp68_OuZxg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<BC57B367-8548-4947-B29C-A69378423BA8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<631C0577-E61D-40BC-B200-96BA897092E6 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<DAC3E2ED-AB1E-42C7-AA0B-78853F31A95A AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20150802172151 DOT 45DD480395AE AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<EEDC318A-1649-4FCD-B80C-7D58F89668BA AT noqsi DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<EEDC318A-1649-4FCD-B80C-7D58F89668BA@noqsi.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spamina-Bogosity:	Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score:	-1.0 (-)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report:	Content analysis details: (-1.0 points)
	pts rule name description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
	0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
	See
	http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
	for more information.
	[URIs: aspodata.se]
	-0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20%
	[score: 0.0959]
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 02:52:06PM -0400, John Doty wrote:
> 
> On Aug 2, 2015, at 1:21 PM, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote:
> 
> > John Doty:
> > ...
> >> Note that it is entirely possible to create distinct modules from
> >> overlapping sets of schematic pages.
> > 
> >> You can have an ab.sym with source=a.sch and source=b.sch
> > ...
> > 
> > Do you have two source attribs in the symbol, or do you have a
> > symbol ab.sym in the schematc a.sch, where the symbol have a 
> > source=b.sch attribute ?
> 
> Two source attribs in the symbol. Like slotdef, you can have as many source attribs as you need in a symbol. 

In my designs, I've never set the source attribute in the symbol, only
in the instances.

> This could be considered a design defect: how do you promote and override 
> this sort of attrib? 

I always had the impression that the attribute handling rules are too 
complex; it would be much simpler to say that all attributes are promoted 
and the symbol attributes are only sensible initial default values, which 
are always ignored when processing the schematics (generating a netlist 
being the most common example).

BTW, doesn't the net attribute have similar problems: many 74xx symbols
have net=VCC:14 (or 16, or 20) and net=GND:7 (or 8, or 10).

> Maybe these should be multi-line instead.

People using MS Windows like multi-line file names.

    Gabriel

- Raw text -