X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb-rnd: parametric footprints (status update)
Date:	Sun, 19 Jul 2015 16:19:17 +0200
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<mogbl5$h5o$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507181958130 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <CAHUm0tN00Ge4gKLMBOngteU9Uq3V1SmHZpRJKyL4ibmbQf7NYw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	a89-182-11-108.net-htp.de
User-Agent:	KNode/4.14.1
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Erich Heinzle (a1039181 AT gmail DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> in my opinion, one of the biggest hurdles/learning curves for new
> users is getting workable footprints when moving from gschem to pcb.

+1


> Anything that simplifies generic footprint selection during design
> is good for prospective users.

The arguably easiest way would be to have footprint attributes set in 
the default library. Of course a default footprint cannot suite every 
need. But there are certainly standard footprints for standard 
components. They can provide a starting point which lets you do a 
working layout without having to dive into the depths of footprint / 
symbol generation issues. 
That is why I started the  "essential library".
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kaimartin_knaak/essential/essential.html
No much resonance from developers, yet.

---<)kaimartin(>---

- Raw text -