| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Virus-Scanned: | amavisd-new at neurotica.com |
| X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore: | I do not consent to surveillance, prick |
| X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com; |
| s=default; t=1436910439; | |
| bh=0/SMzOvnXPQHNmLkwc2FO6ODQ/diq5tYgmv3BqsVsB4=; | |
| h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; | |
| b=WByI2X0Oc6s1jRrkCfddm+uUmiAUYb3RnieXk7dPnxlLeDRA7aZrukd/i2AN++2H5 | |
| wEAoM0EBwqgV/uYtiR7jZUd6yLtJuCih1gvvJO4qp0a3EeeCKWUaZXLCh8LlbuA4ui | |
| ZurWDz15I727IXfqE/f4YTr1OFo+JbjAblJU2w1c= | |
| Message-ID: | <55A58363.8050804@neurotica.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:47:15 -0400 |
| From: | "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Re: geda-gaf on FreeBSD and probably other architectures |
| References: | <20150714103959 DOT GA17565 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150714140911 DOT GA18818 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150714143415 DOT 18024 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507141725200 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <20150714210811 DOT 15037 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20150714213413 DOT 16903 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> |
| In-Reply-To: | <20150714213413.16903.qmail@stuge.se> |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
On 07/14/2015 05:34 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>>> Does the awk program work also with GNU awk -c and/or awk on OS X and
>>>> *BSD?
>>>
>>> That would only convert a "not all systems have GNU date (or GNU binutils)
>>> by default" problem into a "not all systems have GNU awk" problem, IMO.
>>
>> -c
>> --traditional
>
> Actually, it is far better to completely remove the build date from
> the binary. This allows the program to be built reproducibly, which
> is important.
But isn't there a datestamp in the ELF files anyway?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |