X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:39:50 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCB interface (ECAD vs. MCAD)
In-Reply-To:	<1436782404.960.19.camel@ssalewski.de>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1507131229500.12760@nimbus>
References:	<76520AC3-3E8D-4F80-A912-AB076DD8D0C6 AT icloud DOT com> <1436782404 DOT 960 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Your basic idea is good. It would make sense to have a common core for 
> mechanical and electrical cad.

This is the idea behind Xi[0].  It is a common core which can be used for 
mechanical cad, layout, and schematic capture.  This would also solve the 
key binding problem, plus it would feel much more integrated. ;)  The dock 
attribute editor you suggested is already implemented in Xi.

What's missing is basically the domain specialization; I'm currently 
working on that.

Roland


[0] http://hedmen.org/xi/

- Raw text -