X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=Y8uCQYFH8cN97ng8Bv9oyqoXjix4SAjoiNeRqa7+hIo=;
	b=P0/7IaWDvW6+Ve5dqaFFMhwK+MqU019FFPe/nd7WiP4YhW+/vGVgFxvdlBzl9vk4B4
	ef7W+GK3wdlV85uNTZPFBRfSFmP9M5iMrjWCKnMOUD0/mGlG9vS7MwZVEg9bhC+++lZ7
	Eu9h0y+GlyNlKFCW3M44RwJmRxwmEoPfBFxDdgYGNEwYoxo9dKRhTsHRf1SK7gaTibl7
	LKaiihoHSTAyv+4EYmIAzQY25JBZbggOCf6J5YSOu4QSeH6S5X+ZX5CsnWguEOtMT3Gj
	jocDJI7bv1a4sJEhsZwsLVqIdgeASwmFHWT52H4J2r9dwy4WA4K97VS3PQcvTeIcfPtq
	s1xQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.37.102 with SMTP id x6mr16762979laj.69.1436479226464;
	Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<201507092150.t69Lo53N002627@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<1436477539 DOT 1747 DOT 21 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<201507092150 DOT t69Lo53N002627 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2015 22:00:26 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhStaQk46uUyHEabTpTFriKPoqQCpApWLSaSFZUST-w9TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] What is the hardest part in a PCB layout program?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 7/9/15, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> The hardest thing inside pcb is figuring out the right interface
> between the data and the tools that manipulate it.  Some tools need
> low-level geometry, like DRC or the GUI.  Others need high-level
> assemblies, like microstrip routers or gerber (which needs to export
> pins, not circles).  Others (like optimizers) need both.
>
> With the right interface, adding tools is more streamlined and less
> likely to interfere with other tools, with less overhead and less
> duplication of code.

That problem seems to be endemic to all EDA not just the pcb part.
Perhaps that should be a short term mission. (not trying to push you
into it, just trying to find a focusing point)


-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -