X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP:	207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID:	jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Back annotation (was: developer excitement?)
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1507091404410.6924@igor2priv>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2015 07:40:20 -0600
Message-Id:	<44FED82A-8277-427B-87A8-FBC5E9A3D0E5@noqsi.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507090507530 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507091329350 DOT 3444 AT nimbus> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507091404410 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t69DeTs7018909
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

An afterthought:

On Jul 9, 2015, at 6:15 AM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:

> There are the usual corner cases when two applications/threads/authors want to make modification on the same thing, e.g. what happens if i have a (pcb-gschem-wise) consistent design and then I change the same pinout in two different ways in the same time in PCB and in gschem and then do a forward annotation and a back annotation... But I think these could beworked around.

If you’re just making changes until a diff shows nothing, it doesn’t matter whether you make them upstream or downstream. Just quit when you have a match!

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -