X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=9wlVhyzXwVpGbErg1bSJbdM9QLSWCyFcaYmVx/7blg0=;
	b=MOVGP3Qv811x4fYfdN9JW9NQbiuQKRiozbHnzdnnzJprXvrPdi+Oa+fyGE/xBAse/P
	JNHjmzA4VfwXK2s7OCHP7LVNTZAZ8QCfBzZW82jh63iSbaxFXmc5I75gR+NrIVD0InFI
	yrJsRqctfjeIAW7BBMRrZHz2U7CL1L3EBIu/dvGa+azfQ2U+y9neKpLbQ8PFEhr4LW7H
	468GiLAfOu+Qptbg0tgDLd8KCszpOEOnxhq6LJDSFcycOejhgPm1lgy4kG0OsG5A8tgW
	XU78RzKGVmdWlJZplnTPlycy3mF6S2w6Js418UinO5tYlQu9qW2NdNwnUTzqpkW5zYsF
	F/Hg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.203.162 with SMTP id kr2mr11921694lac.57.1436398161986;
	Wed, 08 Jul 2015 16:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<20150708230514.31966.qmail@stuge.se>
References:	<CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201507082208 DOT t68M89eQ016621 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRpH2gGYVC-bZ8XsX5xwb27R+6RdaR78O3addr-LuZbkw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150708230514 DOT 31966 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jul 2015 23:29:21 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhQfBEsb+uzwerNaND+rS3207EPrQrXjhgHHa3nvDHizNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Ok and all of those are fair points but I kind of feel like people
have just throw up a wall for no reason.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> I am trying to find a way to bring back the higher level of engagement
>
> I think the best course of action is that you work on what engages
> you. Anything else will not likely engage anyone else.
>
>
> //Peter



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -