www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=WUk9RTiCUvAU/RYVkz/1LLyuqsfkuBgN5AkPx16IRDM=; | |
b=najFbv97OSEkIDkQYJQ4A2UpKWJAksAZRxIWEWalDJAhHCHR/qncKyyrx+uHZxZ03d | |
U1/TkSFmTqp/xRyoP4rKc5E3jr1EgPPUAzjXUAx4yXOrYjtDRTa7To/nKDDobxNf+WOl | |
hGQsZLYCFDf8hcAdrpjhsFX7UNht2hpbmJiwrcT1m7bwsHpjgQ1uwiUTuRXrUZR80jYo | |
NU7S+6/mv3GhFYfzH7HMOhBdbIKOg4CS7zwUOsuaEo1bJ/BRhcd3xacNlvJd8He5uxEC | |
4Kr/MtNRF8LUEk4ti/u8yn1OVrMlMkAGlOYDBv3zw3V61DfwNV3UvK77ArDfg9/o5BHt | |
qoJg== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.112.222.133 with SMTP id qm5mr11707246lbc.86.1436394251490; |
Wed, 08 Jul 2015 15:24:11 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <201507082208.t68M89eQ016621@envy.delorie.com> |
References: | <CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<201507082208 DOT t68M89eQ016621 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
Date: | Wed, 8 Jul 2015 22:24:11 +0000 |
Message-ID: | <CAM2RGhRpH2gGYVC-bZ8XsX5xwb27R+6RdaR78O3addr-LuZbkw@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? |
From: | "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:08 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > I work on PCB when I'm designing a PCB and need something changed. > Sorry to be practical, but if I don't need any new pcbs, I'm not going > to do any development. I have other things that are higher priority > for me. > > What we need is for people to want certain features bad enough to > "own" them in the official repos, and then gather like minds to work > on those features. I am trying to find a way to bring back the higher level of engagement the project once enjoyed. I see your point but coding something that inspires no greater response is kind of a waste. People have over the last few years coded stuff but none of it has pulled in the community in a meaningful way. I think that had more to do with what repo they used.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |