X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore:	I do not consent to surveillance, prick
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1436378165;
	bh=9iAQRCOjnwnlOJjMegWIwZci56pX1l851xbpQog7bkQ=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=c0uNoG+RZ0G8x8H284KoyOvekhQrdD8eiyXWSOB7gsXj7aZN5ALQL8tczGxqwyhnA
	7dHTe9louXzkxdgIrmZ6EmqtEt/QKrQScM0DlDayKpHwL1CHY5MJ61S7CuXCDXOEpg
	smTuLfjSj2JHdlcrG7g9cfQxCPGKMwVhX4DQvYJE=
Message-ID:	<559D6434.3070601@neurotica.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0400
From:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAFC5WMoa2-z6bNca_bQN+jmMR260UBmoJQybUzH=L2TrBpzNNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAC4O8c9f0pLsLu_dyuO5ggh7RmHY1vAA=UUhk9AE0JYZb4mhBQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAM2RGhQfPO31-1Uyc3kC7w286r0VD7c41UZEZcyYquzknCxbsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150707060409 DOT GB14357 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAOP4iL2C_LU=RQy5FWYF-7RrHW6tqhqqyFJGjkwLQ2AD7FiYJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1436287952 DOT 678 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <559C0F7E DOT 7010009 AT neurotica DOT com> <1436295556 DOT 678 DOT 91 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <CAOuGh89C71vTW00QLQgVBAQy=m6Me8khjqep=eFH7KgKGqaSzw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <559C3778 DOT 4000105 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAOuGh89G5eGP0Z9ORd6SdRv=LjiS4fhxYWTriRX-YBqx2f0DUA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAOuGh89G5eGP0Z9ORd6SdRv=LjiS4fhxYWTriRX-YBqx2f0DUA@mail.gmail.com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t68I6CoH018610
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 07/08/2015 08:56 AM, Bob Paddock (graceindustries AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>   Erlang looks fantastic, until you get to that
>> nonintuitive-to-thepoint-of-incomprehensibility syntax!
> 
> That is where Elixir is coming form.
>  I do think they made a mistake in getting rid of the single
> assignment variables.

  If Elixir solves Erlang's horrible syntax problem, I will definitely
have to take a look at it!

>> (unless you're running an iAPX-432, which I'm assuming you
>> aren't! ;))
> 
> Didn't I give you my 432 data books?

  I don't believe so.  If it turns out that you still have them, I'd
love to get my hands on them!

> An obscure short lived processor that did end up influencing those
> that came after it.
> 
> Have any 432 based machines in your collection?

  Sadly not.  Very few were produced, and the people who have them
aren't turning loose of 'em.  My focus is primarily minicomputers and
supercomputers, but I'd still love a '432-based system because it's such
an unusual architecture.

> BTW, I would not describer your place as a rock.  More of a cave. :-)

  It looked a lot like a cave the last time you were here.  We've made a
great deal of progress over the past couple of months, though; a
producer and film crew came here last month to take some footage for a
program they're pitching to The Discovery Channel about technology
preservation.  That provided a very effective kick in the butt to get
things organized in here.  The first floor is very nearly presentable now.

> Seriously, everyone really should make a trip to see the computer
> museum Dave is setting up.
> I've wondered around the maze of many machines he has in this large
> warehouse sized setting.
> Impressive collection.

  Thank you!

             -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -