www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=uGcFC5p3q1dlAgpiPmVBJhbGQkYwd5bTJ4lNYEgOgFw=; | |
b=V/KiovGmOUipTyi7Mfbtx2bJQ2p4BgeXXxWLSorui7OunX0PZbl9Wc5Vb/5blFy2j2 | |
MqWvM29UzdXewvLMxORXwIEL9XkA0+F2Xjtf6CBgnMS1STZahfxYy4qtU8I/iG0F94P4 | |
Yz1vhRf8QyrG0bH6karvZXMNObXd91BbggGjXMBqWcjqa+gzrkkGFUFJ4iMX06w9I7Mb | |
TUiCRcbUhPjX7eQcxsfl79Ihm0OCHAqRU/p9uxBytd2nPlWS4wiNcPhDnGBbD5hG+Dr1 | |
jmGRk5zA+Z0GAdKfkXalNhpHlC0ph0S1LEKpcl1R85t8LjLTJsSFImdiX67dkPKaEESa | |
S9Fw== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.50.43.196 with SMTP id y4mr59505709igl.14.1436359805222; |
Wed, 08 Jul 2015 05:50:05 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <559C8273.7070107@neurotica.com> |
References: | <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> |
<CAFC5WMoa2-z6bNca_bQN+jmMR260UBmoJQybUzH=L2TrBpzNNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> | |
<20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
<CAC4O8c9f0pLsLu_dyuO5ggh7RmHY1vAA=UUhk9AE0JYZb4mhBQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<CAM2RGhQfPO31-1Uyc3kC7w286r0VD7c41UZEZcyYquzknCxbsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20150707060409 DOT GB14357 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
<CAOP4iL2C_LU=RQy5FWYF-7RrHW6tqhqqyFJGjkwLQ2AD7FiYJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<1436287952 DOT 678 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> | |
<559C0F7E DOT 7010009 AT neurotica DOT com> | |
<20150707183339 DOT GA1817 AT alpha2> | |
<559C3667 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> | |
<1436305751 DOT 678 DOT 145 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> | |
<6F56FB28-1576-4B94-B7C4-B455B5C0A4CF AT noqsi DOT com> | |
<559C5898 DOT 60809 AT neurotica DOT com> | |
<5C62B02C-5B35-4F95-8504-3A1C043FD469 AT noqsi DOT com> | |
<559C8273 DOT 7070107 AT neurotica DOT com> | |
Date: | Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:50:04 -0400 |
Message-ID: | <CAOuGh8_ZRw9T9HPQ_Mn-vfRuh7QiRxVvu-jfvpktnv5tSjbQ_A@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? |
From: | "Bob Paddock (graceindustries AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t68CoAgQ017367 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
>> I think you’ll find that true of every programming language. Not a >> good discriminant. > > Of course, but I think you see my point. If we're waiting for the > light to go on above everyone's head and all of us to agree on what > language gEDA is to magically get translated into, it's not likely to > happen. Seems to me we are having the wrong discussion. I see this in job ads all the time. "We need a programmer fluent in XYZ". What I want to know before I apply is what is the problem they need to solve? Maybe I have experience in that problem domain, maybe I don't. The language is not really relevant to solve the problem that they want to solve. What they want to solve is shipping a product to make a profit. The language is not going to ship a project, yes a bad language can kill a project not my point here. Is there a language that exists, regardless of how common it may be, that would be the best to use to solve problems in gEDA's domain? If there is not a language to that problem domain, maybe it needs created. Before picking up the hammer lets figure out what we are trying to build, rather than debating the size of the nails.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |