www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailer: | exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5 |
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: | repl |
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: | inbox |
From: | karl AT aspodata DOT se |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? |
In-reply-to: | <CAM2RGhTRQCA5D=1XB2yELZ47nF9uu247CbJjOrJ82EJMNwPAfw@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAM2RGhSb=z35RYaJQmh-S4N73ng9WOj4ySmy_05J-7KGdBv8SA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAOP4iL3VBaS+bJhKJDk=_iuBSjDPY2-pvMdz5zPnf7A_rwD0Jw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150703191532 DOT GB21182 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507040542390 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <20150705021010 DOT 369968038A2C AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <CAM2RGhTRQCA5D=1XB2yELZ47nF9uu247CbJjOrJ82EJMNwPAfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
Comments: | In-reply-to "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
message dated "Sun, 05 Jul 2015 03:28:50 -0000." | |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Message-Id: | <20150705092042.7F4318038A2D@turkos.aspodata.se> |
Date: | Sun, 5 Jul 2015 11:20:42 +0200 (CEST) |
X-Virus-Scanned: | ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Evan Foss: > The community of developers had a different make up 4 years ago. My > opinion on things is somewhere between John Dotty who is asking for > people to use rigger in PCB and is still developing using Scheme and (What is "rigger" in this context?) > Igor2 who acknowledges that Scheme is harder to find developers for. > > Imagine if the source was written in PL/I. How much development in the > future would you expect it to get? You don't have to convince me. I have a dev. account and I started working on libgeda docs., but real world issues has distracted me. Would enhancing the c-lib libgeda be more accepted now than for four years ago ? Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |