X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=Zh0kSAdK+9vwmXlj+0VbHuqrjacBkWkiyNwt4raUSf4=;
	b=OQwzxlAQYvXqXLsASoHzTyBxvLNai0fOwkMEtUwA0bA+LJNj09is2LO4cufNOS56fL
	DVW25ds+oBW6OKm+RTm33bGA4njQLQ4t60gC+kXBvOUpqs9zD6zwgJ1P9UiR3LChBK+z
	pZ6+FnFgIILd1/JsCy5lR1GXAvFMQiu/vooiv0iwD2N5ajklLEjFkDs+oBmOiqBpNKaz
	CAY91AAGZih1eD2Ub245KLoP8liJip6WlIBLJi1NYNUvjQwhy/ROrx4sovvpehg0him0
	rouW0iaErOfuMM1U/uj8vhYwS0rkXaq2MKdb2+jM9x4LKD9qsUR0d2rqRdyhXoo7sAhS
	NMFg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.164.35 with SMTP id yn3mr33449943lbb.91.1435990971811;
	Fri, 03 Jul 2015 23:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CA+KzSgJM1U3vtxbH+9biKkpF+cp92Ts4jqZaKnr=QMgO+JaYoQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CA+KzSgJM1U3vtxbH+9biKkpF+cp92Ts4jqZaKnr=QMgO+JaYoQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 4 Jul 2015 06:22:51 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhQ66bFjU-sXyrmHp7rT6weRKiA0VxeAOxriXcG0ByNx=g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Perhaps. I wonder how many people will take it as a call to action though?

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Mitch Davis
(mjd+geda-user AT hackvana DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> Stefan Salewski wrote:
>> > maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage and development is
>> > nearly death is wrong?
>>
>> Look, open source software development can not die! I react quite
>> strongly indeed to those who throw this ridiculous expression around!
>
>
> Maybe that was his intention.  If so, seems to have worked.
>
> (grumble troll grumble)
>
> Mitch.



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -