X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=ugB5i8UYhAQup1PFu1/c6aom1QqYXOAD/zCENL76sFM=;
	b=mNt+1YLTvHt9fPnqcQHMQOrMKKPheQNhMRmcrRXAYd2RwGvYVx2YGHPaa3E4X9H2wD
	67+vntUWgcYMDogzx5RdLCetmuJWLlE/RIYHlNMqON6OOG67uiKVeGrJCr5HmQEF5VX6
	gNx03dD8SgCFHUPLZxHkL2Pfi8g8HdlQteMspsuz1IZyLSYyKnLr1CPtA+51ztEMxxDA
	d8jVftUp+j7fp/2PQMUWkmXG9dsw+enq+sGogPze1vSR56B8L0ggnDS2UQ6oPLw6BZQZ
	ruMTdyX5MAj0pyixrqW642YskK5TVSPw3s+fVtLdEldCMAnItO7H5pRdnfG5izU3DpK9
	75Hg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.161.197 with SMTP id xu5mr19759640lbb.69.1435672789929;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<1435666431.676.13.camel@ssalewski.de>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1506281932040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAOFvGD7npho6fPKAEmce6L1nXy=5EEsVaEH-Vj_XEuiLddodDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150630083528 DOT GY19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<1435666431 DOT 676 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:59:49 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhQ75UcoEoz4zeEcyEShj+8C8ACJj4-iB7F1r+jyy+bUvw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

John Doty : In the name of a more open workflow I was advocating PCB
changing/adding TSV as an accepted input format for the other
attributes I was suggesting. The idea being to break out of the
workflow issues you see in PCB.



On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 10:35 +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
>> it would be nice if I could just draw the schematics, choose
>> footprints for it, route the PCB, and send the Gerber files to the
>> fab.
>
> Sure. I think that is the main reason that so many people (at least here
> in Germany) are using Eagle. Eagle is not very powerful, not very easy
> to use or beautiful, but has a large collection of trustful symbols and
> footprint.
>
> For FOSS EDA situation is not that good. Some people may create some
> symbols or footprints and maybe make them public available, but do not
> care much about systematically naming or quality. There are a few
> exceptions of course, Mr Luciano (name may be misspelled) tried to
> create high quality PCB footprints, and some people at gedasymbols tried
> it also. I am not sure if situation is really better for KiCAD. And
> converters from commercial products like Eagle? I do not think that is
> really legal and that commercial companies will like that.
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -