X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:35:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
In-Reply-To:	<55902AB9.9000004@neurotica.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1506281932040.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) wrote:

> On 06/28/2015 12:52 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>> Recently I saw some messages on gEDA list, last was something about
>> Python netlister just now. So maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage
>> and development is nearly death is wrong?
>
>  I don't know why you would have that impression.  I use it almost
> every day, I just don't talk about it much on the mailing list unless I
> am looking for help with something.  I suspect it's the same for much of
> the user base.

Me too. I did a lot of hobby projects and a few projects for a company 
with gEDA.

I am happy that there are no new releases of gschem stuffed with new 
features - for me, gschem is complete.

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -