X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=+8Zl96n4Uy4kkmUHpdv98+8dhWL1LivhV4Y2iRybPaY=;
	b=FnYyISNVeL2zJ5QNUoG4Md4G1E7ODenX4jW9GqMpLzn1ifoYUY1/WpdSBlOTLd9oER
	7xuJzjQ7vIhddIgT1R3rgTQnv9e3TpfgKC+xdWCk2bRy+a3uTG0oaj8gPRXGdnIgAwr7
	XY/tLw/s3qolc0H0fo5JiRGc+dqXhBNiHVOmAc/DVu7d4W3m3W9Y6VIc1FUjIdwwyv4G
	WoclpzgJVV4s56OUIoNDFBTpwPxQ69CFxBxvJJK9Og9QZHpPqGXPk6XVtpsCMJ8fC+ir
	ksIirRsLezPcO/3KLRLorKpQm7X/f4zpA/S8icTmt8Onr7z86OkS2DZUgCORWLPKGgkV
	f4vg==
X-Received:	by 10.152.42.230 with SMTP id r6mr8604104lal.30.1435491220607;
	Sun, 28 Jun 2015 04:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sun, 28 Jun 2015 14:33:38 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Progress with the Python netlister
Message-ID:	<20150628113338.GB23984@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1506271939390 DOT 16849 AT nimbus>
	<mmn7ed$l5j$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<mmn7ed$l5j$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:17:49AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Roland Lutz wrote:
> 
> > Please note that the Python netlister doesn't execute any Scheme code at
> > all, including the standard gEDA configuration files.
> 
> This is actually huge. It reopens the door to a native windows port of 
> geda!
> 
> Reminder: There has been no windows build of geda since about 2011. The 
> road block is the dependency on guile 2.0. However, the 2.0 series do not 
> cross compile with the MinGW tool chain, which was successful before. Last 
> time I checked, nobody worldwide had managed to do a cross compile by any 
> means. There were a number of bug reporting posts on various guile related 
> or cross compile mailing lists. But no answers that hinted to a solution. 

I've managed. I worked on it since February and found several bugs in
guile and geda-gaf and workarounds for them.  However, before I found
the fix for the gaf utility, I upgraded my OS (Debian) at home and at
work, which broke making of objcode in M$windows.

Now I'm trying to recover the environment where all it worked.

- Raw text -