X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=PAne6XWiAEmglt0b1Aoru7yg9Aq+tnyXfHh/txR4D10=;
	b=ZpNgTUFFv7HpagczEeRDbMi6WfLyOIfEaJp2tuEniCmXhE/8DPcxKpeoFnqYDyeQQL
	gMtyyxUV2LQxP+VP4tdnasqLKPnZh+TECxG2nYCP0+caSjKq8ycUTyr6yW63UXLZdcRc
	9DTf9v9+xMdZPYTKugCEY8NS5a2AG1/Vz+rS8u3oOYEa4ZvzvubcpF9aEtXbzPOYoSA3
	y1VbF/h432Gaz8xxUF2aFzQ6pvmjHCWBdZ6xcuffNAKeA9MEDWZessmivCBbJiUeY04Y
	Fa4efgWt1fdhIRsmmtZ0Poo3LY6Ar7gBI9aVCoJrBXcBR9z2jQsF3+ADYsJpePGvwdSX
	Xl9w==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.202.68.213 with SMTP id r204mr15178815oia.97.1432701892652;
	Tue, 26 May 2015 21:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<mk3acb$ln0$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<CAC4O8c-G9gLnnxm3byvhX09e2rT4V-Ryqv1UuA-5NcqU2VSn3g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201505240134 DOT t4O1YnYq000593 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_QC_sh-EmUU_fO+6T1QdQWZUKbQFEyhoc1311Sr7eOiA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201505241749 DOT t4OHna2m003035 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<mk3acb$ln0$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2015 20:44:52 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c97kO9nijVhTQVL5U2gq8=4bTQhf5rkQ=VUHDWKKq6ACg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCB short detection not working why?
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t4R4ivt1023434
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> wrote:
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>>> Is there a note somewhere explaining the differences, or can you
>>> summarize them briefly?
>>
>> The Import() action is documented in the manual, under "Actions":
>>
>> "Note that Import() doesn’t delete anything - after an Import,
>> elements which shouldn’t be on the board are selected and may be
>> removed once it’s determined that the deletion is appropriate."
>>
> (May I suggest to split this three line sentence in four or five?
> Would be easier to comprehend for us non native speakers...)
>
> I see an additional difference:
> The import action reads the path to the library of footprints from the
> parameter "library-newlib" given in .pcb/preferences . The gsch2pcb
> wrapper looks at .gEDA/gafrc instead.

That would probably explain why I had to add -lib-newlib `pwd` to my pcb
alias to make it find the footprints in my usual spot (the current dir).

I find that gsch2pcb still wants to change some things in a pcb file that
has just been updated with Import Schematics.  Its weird little stuff: a
few dimensions in a footprint are changed, and for some reason the value of
a 10 ohm resistor (which for some reason ends up as 'Part number name "10"'
in the Cntrl-R output for the part) ends up with a value of "10_" or "10-"
(I forget which now).

It looks like Import Schematics is trying to be the same as gsch2pcb and
coming really close.

Britton

- Raw text -