X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	Debian amavisd-new at papyrus.altaweb.hu
Date:	Sun, 5 Apr 2015 12:56:19 +0200
From:	Lev <leventelist AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] 3D view
Message-ID:	<20150405125619.2e2e8dde@jive>
In-Reply-To:	<55210CB8.1020202@prochac.sk>
References:	<mf4sfo$f8j$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<435039979 DOT 124044 DOT 1427520523995 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
	<5520F54F DOT 1040808 AT prochac DOT sk>
	<20150405111538 DOT 410e52f1 AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<55210CB8 DOT 1020202 AT prochac DOT sk>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t35AuT0c001081
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 12:21:44 +0200
Milan Prochac <milan AT prochac DOT sk> wrote:

> With all respect to Bert's work, who knows about the PCB-plugins 
> package? Almost nobody - 63 downloads in 4 years... I tried find some 
> reference to it on gEDA/PCB pages... no luck.
> 
> Why cannot be these plugins  part of PCB's source tree as user 
> contributions? They would get  more attention, I guess.

I'm with you. I don't really understand why the core developers reject such
contributions.

The problem with plugins is that they should be also maintained. So if
someone makes a change in PCB, the plugins might not be able to compile
anymore. I've seen that before.

So I think the plugin way is just one step ahead, and it would be great if
your code merged into PCB head.

> I will change both my exporters to plugins, some changes are required 

I think this is one step forward. Again, it would be nice if it was in the
main branch of PCB.


Levente

- Raw text -