X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=nvSpvag8cWM5rz3qkhsW9Ym8N+SiT8dYKytNwZenOsk=;
	b=sPz9gPz1IlFRL+9ALDfWkg3NzvPdr/D3Tc/q2KDOYc80vkwVSs5YMsVkYC5Bz/weyb
	zr7z8/mf4b2bSroi0L+zkGd012yFiKF0gw+XLpL/tkJ42lB64z4VbJq8RThSm3kthmW9
	wT5rlEI0WPUA17sN/jzSzQufF/24FTPqRiZMWIQIlgL3FR2KeNvjC4mYZuV+vSByY2l6
	tddgVebCnfpsnLHqTruY6M6t5Lr69lZR2ObuPoWHKEbOrZMAaY74JWMJ8/pKZzHh9xt+
	+293Ul7msIPlFXWaItZ796v3fhHQQJjmbrgNhAkYVZlXV7ky8zMRwdFy62EX/UFEKxRn
	dBMw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.182.199.70 with SMTP id ji6mr57380938obc.3.1426694532094;
	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1503180827170.25799@igor2priv>
References:	<CAHLh21Cdm=YZuqCQ+gCHSviJquahr6cnAQ-VBLR4BSs-nfHOig AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOFvGD4+4bHXNYLvePi70wb_1A4=dQgb_Ov3xBghoKbXQUsSGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5508413E DOT 4000405 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<46050a0c DOT 619 DOT 14c2850d052 DOT Webtop DOT 45 AT optonline DOT net>
	<CAGYR9veihi_M+B0HXptGYQLMO8=B_KOLM2wmrRNkMLG_9MdQrA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1503180357520 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv>
	<CAGYR9ve_n7VmZ8x-jCQK5eKHMNGp6an9o8EwYZnWQWFiCpGnXg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1503180827170 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:02:11 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c--CeEiKjxCKrs38XGjOyPS0Cy6scZ5HsAFgpi5xDpP_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb alternatives
From:	Britton Kerin <britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:28 PM,  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Bernhard Kraft wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:20 AM,  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>>
>>> I think, at some point, it's be a real major step forward if the standard
>>> lib could be separated from gschem and pcb into a standalone package.
>>
>>
>> I would say:
>> * Lets start a project at github.
>> * There we import the current structure from /usr/share/pcb
>> (debian/ubuntu) and create a subdirectory "structured".
>> * If someone wants to help out he/she can post suggestions/pull requests
>> * There we discuss and move (copy?) all components as required.
>> * Because we are in the world of open source we can just create our
>> own package and make it available at debian/ubuntu launchpad
>>
>> Are you familiar with git?
>
>
> Sorry, git is a show stopper for me - there is no way I can be talked into
> using it.

Our of curiousity, what have you got against it?  Have you tried it?
Its an order of magnitude better than cvs/svn.

Britton

- Raw text -