| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Envelope-From: | paubert AT iram DOT es |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Mar 2015 20:03:12 +0100 |
| From: | Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es> |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] [OT] Temperature sensor and control recommendation |
| Message-ID: | <20150305190312.GA31466@visitor2.iram.es> |
| References: | <CAF3uCZ=G0FztqBtpfvssYCz9WrUORX8+J45xmH9+KutaX6c+gw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
| <201503051621 DOT t25GL09H018380 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
| <54F88BAE DOT 3040606 AT ecosensory DOT com> | |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <54F88BAE.3040606@ecosensory.com> |
| User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
| X-Spamina-Bogosity: | Unsure |
| X-Spamina-Spam-Score: | -0.2 (/) |
| X-Spamina-Spam-Report: | Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) |
| pts rule name description | |
| ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | |
| -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | |
| 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% | |
| [score: 0.4997] | |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:00:30AM -0600, John Griessen wrote:
> On 03/05/2015 10:21 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> >I use the same averaging trick on my thermostats to get 0.1F readings
> >on a 1C-rated sensor. If your sensor isn't noisy enough to use this
> >trick, you can always add noise - you're basically building a 1-bit
> >ADC.
>
> The extra noise lets you explore the single bit crossings of your system statistically.
> Then you get out of the trap of temperature varying, but not seen crossing single bits
> of the system ADC.
That's called dithering and it's used on instruments like low frequency
spectrum analysers to increase dynamic range. I remember one HP spectrum
analyser from the time when these things were carefully documented,
adding some bandpass-limited noise around the Nyquist frequency of the sampler
but above the displayed frequency range (which was only a quarter of the
sampling frequency if I remember correctly).
But for very low frequencies, I would these days consider either a high
resolution delta-sigma ADC (LTC24xx for example but there are many
others), or a time proven solution like a VFC (voltage to frequency
converter). Monostable based VFC need a high stability capacitor to work
properly, but synchronous V/F (AD652, AD774x) do not need any critical
component, and with only two wires for the interface, are easy to
isolate galvanically or optically.
Gabriel
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |