X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<1407608776.2887.20.camel@AMD64X2>
Subject:	[geda-user] Re: How smart is gschems 1.9.1 rubberbanding?
From:	Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 09 Aug 2014 20:26:16 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<1407607347.2887.13.camel@AMD64X2>
References:	<1407607347 DOT 2887 DOT 13 DOT camel AT AMD64X2>
X-Mailer:	Evolution 3.10.4
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 20:02 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> and that we may get diagonal nets when moving
> objects around.

For example, what surprises me:
When we move in gschem the horizontal net to the right,

     |
     |
     |
 ----------

we get this:

    \
     \
      \
 ----------

My initial idea was to let the vertical net unchanged, but maybe gschems
behaviour is indeed better for this case? At least it is more rubberband
like.

- Raw text -