X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=psmay.com; h=date:from:to
	:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type:
	content-transfer-encoding; s=psmay.com; bh=Z5J7sP+XqhU2KfA8lEul5
	YjRUEM=; b=dEM0Zdjfi0Mj5bVdRIIT6pFlI91+jN3QcY4Jm7NlRIcwqlZF+ByhM
	YDsryOZTYI0eZF0g3nN3UBrYej5lvAdNhy0JCaSoifrOP3IUDI7WySgt5oqZsW9O
	XU+AbXHhsM5feE8AGKOfEpExZdVa9Ructp167iZ2DC1VpGXySi2t+A=
Date:	Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:32:24 -0400
From:	"Peter S. May" <me AT psmay DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	[geda-user] gedasymbols on CVS
Message-ID:	<20140407093224.2ec7a38e@philo>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On the topic of contributing to gedasymbols, though: I myself am not a
contributor, per se, but I keep a directory of contributions that I
would make if I were. This directory is, of course, a bzr branch that
gets pushed to github. I haven't used CVS since high school, and it's
been years since I touched svn. I balk at the idea of reverting to
either. Has the possibility of a DVCS-based alternate / experimental /
proof-of-concept gedasymbols archive ever been discussed here?

(And am I correct to duck and cover for asking such a question?)

___
Peter S. May
http://psmay.com/
A0E6 3851 9ABB 112E 7303
DD91 7A2E 91FB 7885 DAFC

- Raw text -