X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=GSmi2C3yloPlrekcFbOB+GASsi4eSddt6YgNhUve8aQ=;
	b=vZ5pQDHptKjdVC6/NR2nhnCv1J6nZ1eD10kmeavkMJmuO8xkoVINbuOrhTdcAyZvAY
	MCzQKhOFhD3E4gluEp50ITKxZgIYlQUnqNbFqnth4uHEfIh+Uj6V44Vd2hl/y1dqYfr6
	qx/E1yAhRh+qq2uAVZKJ72rbOIZudA/yOll/kya6Gy8pitvXqJDmqyaeUQcrJAs9xHEx
	JkXuLYhmfm6KEEwyyspvflHhFS+wgMF8D4TNUVV/rK7hFfPNecmHjfF12B6tHvtAoE/q
	5I1BPmRW5WZWFmK/iMH9dkcnelqI81002Q3YFQ1Jm+povg8xwbbmfbBIWzoJSby/jaOp
	J8tg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.50.253.12 with SMTP id zw12mr18039800igc.28.1392665783106;
	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:36:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<CAOP4iL0SdeqXxVejosAqc9sPMF3n4ciPjf_fyLgPmHkbQy6WxQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CADefDOFZpsbx909CVRp91AQwKq5+FjvhCacdKtGj5uh-QwyWPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL0SdeqXxVejosAqc9sPMF3n4ciPjf_fyLgPmHkbQy6WxQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 20:36:23 +0100
Message-ID:	<CADefDOFKx4E5PN9vobFwLPtJWMPf99bcuVyFG8PfC2F8KyMsQw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA as alternative for KiCad (for me)?
From:	Michai Ramakers <m DOT ramakers AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 17 February 2014 20:13, Ouabache Designworks <z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>
> Some parts of kicad are "weird". They show examples of "Hierarchy" but from
> what I can tell it is really a case of macro expansion.

I think that's correct.

Michai

- Raw text -