X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20130521013029.16526.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Tue, 21 May 2013 03:30:29 +0200
From:	Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] ITEAD?
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<51970516 DOT 6040101 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAL5HA=DVx7-YL=hrUkAzDh18ncWU7ffwmuzyhGUk8dzaZuKzyA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5199AB8C DOT 5060501 AT neurotica DOT com> <CANDNR8qOPEadaaExuEcYbV_sf=YvXk6b6Zx9xhEVJQkyphFFSA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <519AB9DC DOT 4060906 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAKakQcdG0BwtH9MJ+yBqos2GazXyCGWn8oH7emXnjZMBuvJRxQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAKakQcdG0BwtH9MJ+yBqos2GazXyCGWn8oH7emXnjZMBuvJRxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Stephen Ecob wrote:
> one of the engineers of our "partner" company was very happy to
> explain how he'd modified it to give better linearity

What were his modifications?

Did he change some of your assumptions in order to accomplish the
better performance?


//Peter

- Raw text -