| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
| d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
| h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id | |
| :subject:from:to:content-type; | |
| bh=LC6pXQxLmwqr3IBXJAYSLho5RonZ2a6vQZT+cWfwkEI=; | |
| b=wOIX3IZLL+YnBQQ6bz/gIV4RP9KpvcwqSI1YSGwsvr8x2tSbDMiV/Z4j2TXsZvslfv | |
| lL08nRSrds35fy/4jKylSNXkNXLnYpcOlr6O4MBQBUNo0wlCn73hf1rBHoFruGMuWwcp | |
| LgjHEk7oHq3wCIXx66zRTIXBTDcl3UpLtIWWYsZ2zo1jT2wiugWkuhhkWqDnjT+6eWso | |
| jeoAPVXyX1brV4iB3BFOfwrYDy2SVAtwHSEVF0OQTFqb1urYCljGiITba9FQpU/2fejQ | |
| 0to0o0q3l6Xo9yxb2c4iXzyTwitaqP8jSFK13bBHZsoUOF7om0aFJHLMijh4mUrjQgo5 | |
| Q60g== | |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Received: | by 10.43.8.200 with SMTP id ot8mr16337147icb.11.1362255018535; |
| Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:10:18 -0800 (PST) | |
| In-Reply-To: | <512E09F4.3010205@gmail.com> |
| References: | <a1278e5f88ff58af741935c7c66fe3b4 AT mail DOT theimps DOT com> |
| <kgfk8g$ecn$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
| <20130225123922 DOT 2588 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> | |
| <F3C329AE-FFA7-43F6-94C0-FB884329C143 AT jump-ing DOT de> | |
| <512E09F4 DOT 3010205 AT gmail DOT com> | |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Mar 2013 11:10:18 -0900 |
| Message-ID: | <CAC4O8c9qpGCAE-J81VKseMkW7qEWVoJHvG+OK1AGsJzQxngRhQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Building gEDA |
| From: | Britton Kerin <britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com> |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Ineiev <ineiev AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > On 02/26/2013 08:19 PM, Markus Hitter wrote: >> >> Do people actually build from tarballs these days? > > Yes, I do. > >>> The build process does not in any way interact with packages, so >>> packages are not relevant. Header files and symbols in libraries are. >> >> That's entirely true. Giving a hint in which package a library/header/tool >> can be found can't hurt, though. > > Yes, it can. if configure listed all possible locations for various > versions of various distros, it might be a nightmare. So call it a hint, and note that it might be out of date. gEDA goes to greater length elsewhere to document things that are already documented elsewhere. Britton
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |