| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Feb 2013 03:17:16 -0500 |
| Message-Id: | <201302060817.r168HGqE017995@envy.delorie.com> |
| From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | |
| <CAC4O8c8QcEeiPVQXL99FMq8YAc2UcGWJKdCnv-0Ja3PFOJrw5g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| (message from Britton Kerin on Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:14:04 +0200) | |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Panelized design |
| References: | <20130206073257 DOT GA32216 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> |
| <201302060736 DOT r167a0dJ016186 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAC4O8c8QcEeiPVQXL99FMq8YAc2UcGWJKdCnv-0Ja3PFOJrw5g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
> I hate to impotently whine, but I sure wish that somehow gEDA docs > could be consolidated. It's not just me I think, somehow this > software sets records for functionality per unit findability. Yup, we know. In the case of those two scripts, they're not "part of" gEDA, but are part of gedasymbols.org, a community site for third-party add-ons. I'm not sure how such content would be consolidated into the official docs. If you know someone with the time and skills to solve this problem, please let us know ;-)
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |