X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=zn7xKB6SoSyn9mAWA+S3UlAOrYuccEJBEFbUNJuQKmo=;
	b=z43ZQ2SjZpOWRKLB6OPveO/E2GcgExUW8ugJEJMJnd7e/Tax9M2LBjz38KJ9aVlnLS
	BlnWoWuvVoj4p15Kxv2iLhSdLBNcxak8hB7nIoG4jUU6QPNjtZoVT7zux0UpPYCTHG/A
	L3w01Pm6vbak9U5Y9l2YbkCLG3W0HBSTtxe8vmkj2KBUdVIyclp5XPftiiUFsc6VKOW5
	a5yTDnGzgYepAhqIqsCjj927ojnoBfUyMtjCF2et7iwYOCacNliBaA29dXqLG+gVVmpg
	YPVLbm8aX1UOhVnLNluxsJN3mafw/Td04s31AZGkaEn56JxsyslEQ2KhVsN9Jb8yK2CD
	YUeQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<E931FE8F-DF59-4CCF-8AED-6239961F4EF7@noqsi.com>
References:	<20121116030224 DOT 5c7750ee AT akka>
	<201211160225 DOT qAG2PrVD005630 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20121116035513 DOT 14519 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<201211160357 DOT qAG3vUXo017504 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20121116041216 DOT 16057 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<201211160428 DOT qAG4Sh3h018631 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<llhhn9x25t DOT ln2 AT skate DOT rswarbrick>
	<k88cd4$3i2$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20121117163351 DOT 14988 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<5C6FC5CD-A358-476D-A8CA-C9AF2E72A914 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20121117185520 DOT 25698 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<E2A7C157-E0AB-437B-B8FD-1DA96C64AF39 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<k89b87$fip$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<B8C80ED4-E795-41D2-9D76-513A7D09666C AT noqsi DOT com>
	<k8bv02$1ca$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<9C626D0F-7D63-4FBE-8D63-37A2FFAD96FE AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQXd_-f3AD2W0iNTvbUU0o8O727f0sR=vkEjC-zg0PmVw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<71EA2CF8-8F64-4A51-B7C4-5F26EE8F4088 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhR3tC52C8Jj9171a5xogwPy9PA_6DrOBF=F3742cbvAhg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRPE5YpB4p6hBbZwUE-DF4vdMCn-UoZONe9bNPHX+FN-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<D904E454-596B-4B02-82B6-0CA2EC854690 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<25B41A6E-E2ED-4EEB-ADAE-558B8BCFB993 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhSLifJfJLuUWBMiVWgm43FMuqcsypP-No=EJVCixWT8=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhSxYeWHz=ZMhZVTJyxw8k9Y+Mo-mZadrMrw76VN4tY+2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E931FE8F-DF59-4CCF-8AED-6239961F4EF7 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:03:40 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhSCdngR6_sHbbsyhB6RCQ6LgaHVj-ngL1UUhpj8LOXqcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] git mirror of gedasymbols.org
From:	Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:24 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Evan Foss wrote:
>
>> I will concede that right now the current mechanisms have a kind of
>> honesty in that what you enter into the gschem is very literally
>> translated into the SPICE code. However, the values as written in
>> SPICE are just a shorthand invented because of the primitive days
>> SPICE was written in. We don't typically write schematics for
>> documentation using that notation.
>
> I'm not objecting to that. I am pointing out that it may be nontrivial to decide what strings to translate. The thing I won't implement is a sloppy heuristic approach. A clear, easily explainable set of rules is necessary.

You don't know me but I don't do half baked architecture. I was just
suggesting we think about it. I do not care for appending everything
with the SI at the end. I need to think on this idea more.

> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com
>
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -