X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=XrbxvW/Rdn0rcP0l3j7TFEOMxcmCMWgv+wRWrl97S/I=;
	b=lz3TFc6TJCjUmzOQNZveVa6DNJceWzFNiijg9wX9gD1yv7sgjU3+BmHYmP4xryvRy0
	5zMj+KYHNcIqhPYJAxm8qhRAn8LrRwgoE1MK8CzD3GX1HbS7DmlcMxPi7f16tDMfXtvV
	ddLw2HR5e+zw0/C3nd5QpxLX83Ra8IfGb0bnLBOieQMwRh+N4zVKMX+cLjP2yw9xyUMs
	3v7dzTQGr/Mx8Quho0yt/TS6sD5yeGQemWT3ik4z0uEwFqNPeUkT7lvxGAdUk29/EkSA
	J7dn4GCJUgsQF2mp2o4k+0TOOXKlbRSuCJqJ6FvuDLyplWt3BNNqlw+iGbO1z8TKil6d
	M1/g==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<EC6962AC-26B1-40E8-AF4E-B6A65B5DEB9A@jump-ing.de>
References:	<CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<50892DC8 DOT 6080308 AT laserlinc DOT com>
	<201210251629 DOT q9PGTfes029100 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<50897B77 DOT 1030401 AT laserlinc DOT com>
	<201210251859 DOT q9PIxw7n004895 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<F720A597-665F-40D1-B1A4-E02506EE5D09 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<CAGde_xNNrA-QMcXiNQJEkPSfFGeZWLyULAqh0pZfkPAV898NQQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<90F80A7D-69D4-408D-AD92-1530A48DFB9E AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAGde_xPCOxpNub_QAVkChX_0UNVEfyNG2EVvKPXiF2arpyjcOw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<508AC939 DOT 2050205 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<EC6962AC-26B1-40E8-AF4E-B6A65B5DEB9A AT jump-ing DOT de>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:52:47 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAGde_xOOW7VnDkgof+EEgc5dy_0aybe69rtoOw7eFQGFWzhXfg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf
From:	Svenn Are Bjerkem <svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 26 October 2012 20:36, Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de> wrote:
>
> Am 26.10.2012 um 19:32 schrieb Dave McGuire:
>
>
>>   I've gotten links to some good tutorials, and I see the power of it,
>> but it's just so damn foreign.
>
>
> Guess how foreign SVN is if you're used to git ;-) No more collecting a few
> commits to review them again before sending them out to the network. No more
> cherry-picking. No longer private branches. No longer keeping local changes
> in the local repo. Recently I tried on SVN after a few years of distance,
> and failed miserably.

Nice description of a case where git-svn fits perfectly. The pushed
(dcommit) stuff in svn gives the linear version number that you really
need when communicating with other colleagues and customers. git-cvs
also makes my day when I have to touch legacy code they weren't able
to move from cvs to svn.

But software development between releases belongs in git.

-- 
Svenn

- Raw text -