X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=L1sOwbcJf8DWl0KNvTkBnjs3hPxLHAtfUhe4eLD7DE8=;
	b=apAaFrAk9xiDFAMGuYRLHZaFq2apVlxs9qrXZC6APZ7MtvTJVe86EkhWoK2EaYduis
	fzk5h2mVWpk17PjtVG6P5gsIa5itr7C3DVBgnEoKG3q7zuFxN+UXY+6NvKvUH+vTHFcx
	UigeMgUIutmZ0moajY2js5OyelauqXTOKukOOL6Bhr2eyxlEFfQcR3SgczPbVA689rP3
	og0sNOFKEIyAE3EICThOdG7ZV1+f5FCRTpH4+HhjSYdDoiOfeKQhBVuNCrEzk0OXbykn
	57ydTYcgdeK4VGomWx4T1zGqnxO6zUcoe8gchh0AXJojUJaj6PujuJQqJaGw5N2M8FHN
	Ck8Q==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<8CD82772-DF1C-4C82-852C-B9F6A094CBAA@jump-ing.de>
References:	<CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<50892DC8 DOT 6080308 AT laserlinc DOT com>
	<201210251629 DOT q9PGTfes029100 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<50897B77 DOT 1030401 AT laserlinc DOT com>
	<201210251859 DOT q9PIxw7n004895 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<F720A597-665F-40D1-B1A4-E02506EE5D09 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<CAGde_xNNrA-QMcXiNQJEkPSfFGeZWLyULAqh0pZfkPAV898NQQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<8CD82772-DF1C-4C82-852C-B9F6A094CBAA AT jump-ing DOT de>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:16:06 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAGde_xNtp8tb82kiggdzbq-3X7zMY5sHu5TS7dLxJooX3K-pFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf
From:	Svenn Are Bjerkem <svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 26 October 2012 02:10, Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de> wrote:
>
> Am 26.10.2012 um 00:51 schrieb Svenn Are Bjerkem:
>
>
>> On 26 October 2012 00:11, Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> One experience from another project - RepRap 3D printers - is, people are
>>> extremely shy these days. I think it's to some extent because a few years
>>> ago experienced users didn't hesitate to blast out a "you fool!" when a
>>> newbie did something not entirely accurate. That strikes back these days,
>>> press stories here and there about people taken to court for internet
>>> postings do the rest.
>>
>>
>> I think it is healthy that some kind of reality feedback reach some of
>> the largest egos and pull them back to ground. Most people behave when
>> using full name. :-)
>
>
> So you propose shouting at people contributing work? This sounds _very_ odd
> to me.

Nope, I was more talking about the back-strike in court against the
big-mouths. Wasn't clear in my reply.

>> Probably the biggest no-go, in my opinion, is that git is not
>> something a casual user/programmer knows about.
>
> You need a "git clone git://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf" for getting the
> sources and a "git diff" for making the patch. What else?

Depends if you want to keep a local copy of your changes in case you
are asked to do more modifications.

>
> That said, the patches do exist already. Remote repos exist. It's all there,
> so I can't find an issue with this.
>

The only issue I can find is that I don't have commit access to the
geda repository and that I do not know what kind of patches or
repositories we are talking about. With "remote repo" I understand
stuff on github or any other place but git.geda-project.org.

-- 
Svenn

- Raw text -