| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
| d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
| h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
| :content-type; | |
| bh=84vAKf70M9u16NADfayXx2YKcj30avbyZvSc2MVu4jo=; | |
| b=X0hs9pnIcS1IjB3Moh+cLlprC8uzZl1Zkfwo54vzJE3p1y+ryjTmEq51aQ0n05WPKW | |
| WUsZgta0vY8q0ERSMlvO07l1fkEOCPNw27FsiCfmrHcpWpY/IwC3ARO0UqG7FpbpOsvN | |
| +ofM/P5NiKkKVkJMbmsAyCQhhiCcM91ngBbFYjT3h7W1mrNwBy5EjTUjDtEa+8IV/EtA | |
| VQHURyMsz9WSF48Q9D4IDzseHVv6cfGbHTWce5Mh+rxKhGMEGtZ1vOUYAK7Chvh/ek3e | |
| +VRPjbwP1gfs+5SGTxLTumBgMGfyCvU1rBZvOWXUrtBZymiO7IO7evpqosFhEtXALUyf | |
| 4CuQ== | |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <20120817161012.GA28947@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <CACPio-6k5KWuEeHhn=1r8mxYb2HRpXzC5DrTWSaqDxufw7u2YQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
| <k0jl2k$ibn$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
| <CACPio-4unK57Re-HUn_yyhBTt-P-Fph5B0cmVnE6gBzYnXUyww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| <20120817161012 DOT GA28947 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:29:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID: | <CACPio-5yU_r49y5NcGK-9gHTPwuXmM17Cx_Qdigx_mnzcx7Z1w@mail.gmail.com> |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] |
| From: | Nathan Stewart <therealnathanstewart AT gmail DOT com> |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Apparently, the INPUT and IO components need to have a value=INPUT or value=IO. I also had issues with the net= attributes on my power pins - I had them labeled +7V and -7V, and at least -7V is not legal. So I replaced them all with Vdd and Vss, even though emotionally I'm going 'but but but there's nothing in the circuit that says it has to be MOSFET!!!") and I secretly know in my heart that these represent a +/- 7V split rail supply. When I did fix the pin/subcircuits, the IO tags hooked up to the subcircuit symbols also lacked the value=IO, and this appears to have prevented the S1/PIN substitution in a way that confused me. My schem _appears_ to be all good now.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |