X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20120815190638.15362.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:06:38 +0200
From:	Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Version planning
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<502A7291 DOT 90206 AT unige DOT ch> <20120815155142 DOT 30385 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <502BEE3D DOT 8050105 AT unige DOT ch>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<502BEE3D.8050105@unige.ch>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Juergen Harms wrote:
>> Is there any problem with tagging the git tree somewhere in that period?
>
> - For somebody from outside the geda development community

I didn't suggest that you should do it, I asked the question to hear
from everyone who has worked with the source code if they see any
particular reasons not to just tag a release in the time that fits
Mageia.


> Re Mageia release cycle: there has been a long and quite violent debate on 
> that issue, terminated by a council decision to set this period to 9 months 
> - a compromise value (personally, I was positively surprised by the 
> demonstration that a community distro can rapidly and efficiently take such 
> a decision).

It's certainly a huge improvement over the Debian cycle! Well done! :)


//Peter

- Raw text -