X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authenticated-IP:	207.224.51.38
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gnetlist: allow net= attributes without a pin number
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAJisMU3X=s4YhgKxZsxQ7+Z4Obz=9xuKZjbveU9NL8aLQ482Pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:45:12 -0600
Message-Id:	<F76B462F-A4D3-4255-8F8B-D26A07B93907@noqsi.com>
References:	<000301cd644d$75518ab0$5ff4a010$@de> <20120717160113 DOT 2caabc78 AT svelte> <500669D1 DOT 7000206 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk> <CAJisMU3X=s4YhgKxZsxQ7+Z4Obz=9xuKZjbveU9NL8aLQ482Pg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q6IDjKl5031171
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Jul 18, 2012, at 1:58 AM, Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:

> This has been discussed several times.
> The consensus was that hacking this as a special case is frowned upon.
> 
> References:
> http://old.nabble.com/gEDA-user:-Attribute-Net-(without-pin-assignment)---for-Power-and-Port-Symbols-td31365921.html
> http://old.nabble.com/gEDA-user%3A-gschem%3A-net-attribute-for-power-I-O,-clean-appearance--(no-“%3A1”)-tc31102453.html

I don't think there was really consensus. I think Peter Clifton was the main opposition. I'd rather see a more general solution like net:1=foo, but I have no objection to a sane default for the pin number.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -