X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20120713192118.3132.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 21:21:18 +0200
From:	Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Question/advise/suggestion on gschem 'undo'
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20120713122112 DOT 3247247ee710b39349b6bc74 AT jcoppens DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20120713122112.3247247ee710b39349b6bc74@jcoppens.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

John Coppens wrote:
> To my surprise the number of levels of undo was very limited.
..
> (undo-levels 10)
..
> Are the resources necessary for undo levels so large?

I would also like to know this.


> Would it be a problem to have, say, 100 or even 500 undo levels?

Make that 50000, or simply infinite in a linked list.

How are actions stored in memory?


//Peter

- Raw text -