X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.0 cv=NYRkJh/4 c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=jl9P3j1e7_0A:10 a=M_ffKnrP7SkA:10 a=1YAAmJhkF5gA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=1enESzN5AAAA:8 a=nw5G5SlsND6Fkny8FOAA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=LeFdZI19qXIA:10 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score:	0
X-Originating-IP:	70.113.67.117
Message-ID:	<4F729438.6070204@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:31:52 -0500
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] RFC: increment dialog patch
References:	<20120326204111 DOT GA23076 AT malakian DOT lan> <CAKakQceymA5wm0uLS+GGujc_M4QWP4jBeZHrsAFjU759MoyrkQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120328001558 DOT 40f89de0 AT kwak> <1332892196 DOT 2531 DOT 9 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
In-Reply-To:	<1332892196.2531.9.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 03/27/2012 06:49 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> What do you think about my new grid selector?
>
> http://www.ssalewski.de/PetEd.html.en

The image of it looks good.  Is your code ready for people to test it?
Easy to compile?

John

- Raw text -