X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:14:23 -0700
From:	Andrew Poelstra <asp11 AT sfu DOT ca>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] RFC: increment dialog patch
Message-ID:	<20120327021423.GA23328@malakian.lan>
References:	<20120326204111 DOT GA23076 AT malakian DOT lan>
	<CAKakQceymA5wm0uLS+GGujc_M4QWP4jBeZHrsAFjU759MoyrkQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAKakQceymA5wm0uLS+GGujc_M4QWP4jBeZHrsAFjU759MoyrkQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:10:17AM +1100, Stephen Ecob wrote:
> Thanks Andrew, this is a step forward.
> 
> It is a user visible change, but I can't imagine it will break
> anyone's work flow or catch anyone by surprise - it instead removes an
> unpleasant surprise for anyone who discovers the increments dialog and
> expects it to work.
>

I have removed Alt+G and Alt+Shift+G, which might irritate people.
 
> Longer term I'd personally prefer G and Shift-G to cycle through a set
> of user defined grids.  I typically use a non-linear set of grids like
> 0.02mm, 0.04mm, 0.1mm and 0.5mm.  Linear increment +linear decrement
> is a very blunt tool for moving through a set like that.

That would be nice. If someone were to write up a patch for this,
I'd vouch for it.

-- 
Andrew Poelstra
Email: asp11 at sfu.ca OR apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web:   http://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew
"You shouldn't trust every quote you read on the Internet." -- Socrates

- Raw text -