X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<4F6B0AAA.5010406@laserlinc.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:19:06 -0400
From:	Joshua Lansford <Joshua DOT Lansford AT laserlinc DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] use-license: unlimited, dist-license: GPL
References:	<4F6A36A5 DOT 10807 AT laserlinc DOT com> <201203212124 DOT q2LLOCgh028905 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201203212124.q2LLOCgh028905@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Ok.  That makes sense.  So it sounds like I am good to use the symbols 
as long as the use-license isn't gpl or private.

Now ... what about this ... is sending pdfs of the schematics out for 
quote by board houses considered a distribution?

I would think not because it understood that they won't keep the 
schematic for their own purposes.  Thus we aren't "selling" the 
schematic just the boards.
~Joshua

On 03/21/2012 05:24 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> The GPL only covers distribution.  If you're not distributing the
> schematics, it doesn't matter what the symbol dist-license is.
> use-license is the appropriate one for finished boards.

- Raw text -