| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Text formatting |
| From: | Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| In-Reply-To: | <20120309165553.727c8400@svelte> |
| References: | <1331337138 DOT 10630 DOT 1 AT kwak> |
| <1331339779 DOT 2533 DOT 43 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> | |
| <20120309165553 DOT 727c8400 AT svelte> | |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Mar 2012 02:15:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID: | <1331342109.2533.48.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box> |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Mailer: | Evolution 2.32.3 |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 16:55 -0800, Colin D Bennett wrote: [...] > > I would not do manual post-processing like that. > > What if you need to make a change to the schematic? Then you need > to re-do your manual processing in Inkscape. > True. > Anyway, why can't a schematic editor produce clean and beautiful > output?? > Because it may need 5 seconds for startup in that case ;-) Seriously, can we expect an FOSS schematics editor produce as nice graphics as inkscape and as nice text as LaTeX at the same time, and being easy to use also.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |