X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ire.pw.edu.pl;
	h=From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; s=mail; bh=3bmnFSHWybja4lt26BvtNdK8HCY=;
	b=lvzaPMZKVfdN+h9ru/pgb17Y66snUfJW/PXtZv8jUYL3BGwH4DfDLOHPk831Sws/tGfsQ5ekNUzq6gks1ajDtbTdlxCfMzO81xNhyoJ/oc/0a4rnda7qehCnBayiwXMwONNbguXRkT7KpNqXJ0SV19kXYNTKzteV1Bzy9I8kWCb6/wb0Z9fD5Iq6zA1K9sEP+C5VoP5RimfiX6Y6Gkbw0GhLgpAQr4KMf3oVUPGZIRcxyEqaHzpy79WZcBQOpe0swHKXukTyVAoqxPCTC6ZUXOGfUHI5f0CNk2sHhwITiumrbYFoI8+ZXHLub1b6B8565Fp9AIhjoWnQ78OCGg8R8g==
From:	Wojciech Kazubski <wk AT ire DOT pw DOT edu DOT pl>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Legacy indirect includes of glib
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:46:50 +0100
Message-ID:	<sig.4398a6f34b.2442052.m6Gg05BMWC@jawor.ire.pw.edu.pl>
User-Agent:	KMail/4.7.4 (Linux/3.2.2-1.fc16.x86_64; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To:	<4F3BB5A8.4040509@unige.ch>
References:	<4F3AD8BE DOT 9010306 AT unige DOT ch> <3604417 DOT Tsp89YTSkA AT jawor DOT ire DOT pw DOT edu DOT pl> <4F3BB5A8 DOT 4040509 AT unige DOT ch>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Assp-Version:	2.1.1(11364) on ASSP.nospam
X-Assp-Client-TLS:	yes
X-Assp-ID:	ASSP.nospam
X-Assp-Original-Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Legacy indirect includes of glib
X-IRE-MailScanner-Information:	Please contact the ISP for more information
X-IRE-MailScanner-ID:	q1LAkq5g024710
X-IRE-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-IRE-MailScanner-From:	wk AT ire DOT pw DOT edu DOT pl
X-Spam-Status:	No
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> On 02/15/2012 01:39 PM, Wojciech Kazubski wrote:
> > This is problem with guile interpreter. Has it changed recently? It
> > looks like guile is trying to compile all scripts to machine code and
> > can not write the binary due to accesss rights.
> 
> Yes, that is what it looks like. And yes, Mageia 1 (no problems there)
> uses guile-1.8.7, the pre-Mageia 2 guile-2.0.5. The question is: is this
> a problem of guile ( I should file a bug on guile at Mageia - I just
> verified, there are presently no open bugs on guile) or the way geda
> uses guile (a problem here)
> 
> And thanks! Juergen
> 
> PS: our who-is-who question is sorted out - nobody to blame, simply a
> problem of the transition between volonteers who originally imported
> packages from Mandriva, and a second generation who assumed formal
> responsibility as maintainers.

Recently I found that some of my previous mods of m4 footprint library now 
fail on openSUSE 12.1 (using guile-2.0.2). This was due to the construction 
like:
ifelse(condition, result,
          define(`variable', `expression1'),
          define(`variable', `expression2'))

It is OK if the script is interpreted, but when compiled it fixes on one of 
the two possibilities.

Wojciech

- Raw text -