X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20120209175526.27071.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:55:26 +0100
From:	Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Compiling gEDA/gaf with llvm/clang is supported
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<3a220e2814a25d46dfdaf4a4aef0542c AT mail DOT theimps DOT com> <CAOuGh89+wzDLW+QK2o3Tgt8cC8ROm2VVXbegQ5QsFu8nNOuWtg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAOuGh89+wzDLW+QK2o3Tgt8cC8ROm2VVXbegQ5QsFu8nNOuWtg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Bob Paddock wrote:
> is there any functional reasons to prefer one over the other such
> as run time speed of the program for example?

I believe gcc still generates better optimized code for x86.


//Peter

- Raw text -