X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=w06wT80pl1btY0zKt846jQv0DHq5ypzWB/KIqE9H0ag=;
	b=dZrlkev13TCbPoZJldVSrBsuk9hYNqHaSdVsrkqvr+SOf10AagfGbGLa2zSajrSGQD
	ViPsdeI6odAveuhL3ntR4tPAWQK4ajsb5E+5tNprgkzitCDUeYfzxSR3Atz/dU1wYV6r
	GL3qyv58oJIXVg+2VK1P4XUnJpG63Lrx1pFZrGVFBTasZBEule+DhnfWvgpEShC4U96G
	tsiPAhc9YAbnys3FDmo6GfLrGKLYZndGhzzFHurCmR7lOIaOO/hniAHYCrR9jtXF995F
	TwWpy0KeY4q9ySU5gaQZrFBqIVVQMmTsOsowT1ugy607mQLKR6GTjuwayHM15nWOX2vP
	UV/Q==
X-Received:	by 10.112.167.202 with SMTP id zq10mr17783951lbb.118.1435650551060;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:49:08 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Double file inclusion with spice-sdb backend
Message-ID:	<20150630074908.GA13239@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAMonFrTvtcfpcFeb+VZ5yNF=Hn+nOfZmG6c0UuvODcSULa-LPQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150628111548 DOT GA23984 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20150628111548.GA23984@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 02:15:48PM +0300, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38:07AM +0200, Andrea D'Amore (and DOT damore AT gmail DOT com) wrote:
> > Hello,
> > including a file that contains a .model directive using a
> > spice-include symbol in gschem and then exporting the netlist using
> > gnetlist's spice-sdb backend results in a netlist where the included
> > file is present twice.
> > 
> > Is this an intended behavior or a bug? If the former, what's the
> > rationale for that?
> > 
> > Here's a SSCCE to reproduce the issue, include-test.sch:
> > 
> >     v 20130925 2
> >     C 45200 52200 1 0 0 spice-directive-1.sym
> >     {
> >     T 45300 52500 5 10 0 1 0 0 1
> >     device=directive
BTW, the directive device is not intended to contain models in it. It's
for plain SPICE directives, such as, e.g., TC=something and so on.

For models you should use SPICE model or include devices.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -