X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=/ha3cokv92f3XRQrjmAKl8Upztwz3Db1Ta6u1PUG6V8=;
	b=i89yw4+75djHcOpVsLu5uNmjTqRcsU3gB0EnfV13Fhw8tKlrweF/YmXN9IaaN6wxB0
	In7kHxhOxOoM4jWzxPOT8KWeSFqcFdRh+zI0FW+TfNXuZCxKE74y/LPIo5TUkfXiaVCj
	edOKgu1jay3cnVa/VLbqHwsiwL1dz9azDx+mtKN5mfrM6Un5uS5Ez/QvqREQ5YN2FQDf
	49b8DTdTBmCYMK3vJIO3YTMF4qry6AvvLR6FkyUUQT31Dn92FS2JRz5wi/vZ+dWy2UGw
	DngRsTagSDHCbq0HSVEAo1fkIf4d4BZOXuVrrEghdt2mR2v7o9Js0MXuorErwg3iHUOY
	Ni/Q==
Date:	Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:31:50 +0400
From:	Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Need some help with gsymcheck warning messages
Message-ID:	<20121008173150.GB27176@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
References:	<5072321B DOT 5060406 AT twcny DOT rr DOT com>
	<20121008163144 DOT GA11303 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20121008100135 DOT 1ba5e93c AT svelte>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20121008100135.1ba5e93c@svelte>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:01:35AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:31:44 +0400

> But won't it be unconventional and confusing, at the very least,
> to have pins on the symbol that are also secretly connected to a
> net?
No, see below.

> I have seen symbols with hidden power/ground pins, and symbols with
> all pins visible, but never one where visible pins have a hidden
> connection to a net.

There is at least one very useful and widely used symbol: gnd-1.sym :)

-- 
http://vzhbanov.byethost33.com

- Raw text -