X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:38:00 +0300
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: [brobecker AT adacore DOT com: GDB 6.8.91 available for testing]
In-reply-to:	<COL101-W45912C5F42D2F16A02F883E6DE0@phx.gbl>
X-012-Sender:	halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To:	Jay K <jay DOT krell AT cornell DOT edu>
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de
Message-id:	<83ocp5v7nr.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<833a6jwd5d DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <200909192120 DOT 52643 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <83vdjevfzt DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <200909192333 DOT 50394 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <83skeiuqt9 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <COL101-W54A4F652CD7225412AE19CE6DE0 AT phx DOT gbl> <83r5u2um7f DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <COL101-W45912C5F42D2F16A02F883E6DE0 AT phx DOT gbl>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Jay K <jay DOT krell AT cornell DOT edu>
> CC: <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>, <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:30:25 +0000
> 
> Seriously. This definition is in very good company.

So is ours.

> The reason for this new fangled __null is likely to address a long standing problem in C+.

In C++, we do use __null, IIRC.  It comes from the GCC-supplied
header.

- Raw text -