X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=mf6TmcnUDq2A8qw3aqGKcOu+7soK5aqxvmT3YabBAFI=;
	b=qQsUkFePUg0u0FoiWUSNSiFgnEWjTbqe35ve9+6bkv7p+YLTLrIy5v5sUM0qTs6y9g
	27IjFtsxzNXSX86AZBdav805sS1R9BwIIqVFv53rodPhhKxBusm7IFpGqPu47ztkoxXs
	3cfLfrk7N9bOqyrqg35op/f6Ol005NUsCWnhwlYQ+RsUEWjfcVmAsEfqxEgfjz3EZ1ve
	iMaIz9uxRGIsDRilOgLN0pkbypKHpkaEauLzpusvEQ9+jqWZp3xBSAxSwPLuL42cCKwA
	zPYxstki8uhzLt86LuZamugb+FeERVlHVTaFvKff8e1NDGXEXcGDezzXPlE7ghuT5MR8
	9phg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<504F6729.5000505@iki.fi>
References:	<201209111230 DOT q8BCU0rl001296 AT dexter DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
	<504F3374 DOT 3080400 AT iki DOT fi>
	<504F6729 DOT 5000505 AT iki DOT fi>
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:38:32 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAA-ihx-ZcnJ4YziA9mF=+3mBfXXwoV4Rp-RnmAzLpS0S=2wBAg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Invalid tests for __STDC_VERSION__ in DJGPP header files
From:	Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Andris Pavenis <andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi> wrote:
>
> Tried
>
> --- stdint.h.orig       2012-09-09 19:12:59.000000000 +0300
> +++ stdint.h    2012-09-11 19:19:56.936112793 +0300
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>  #endif
>
>
>  #if (defined(__STDC_VERSION__) && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L) \
> -  || !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)
> +  || !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__) || defined(__cplusplus)
>
>  typedef signed char int_least8_t;
>  typedef unsigned char uint_least8_t;
>
> Fixes libstdc++ build problems for gcc-4.8.0 20120909 (again cross-native
> build as
> after removing libstdc++-v3 build directory 'make -j12' on Intel 3930K
> rebuilds it
> under Linux in less than 30 seconds)
>
> The same should be done for other header files which has similar checks.
> Does it look OK?

Here's my question:  isn't GCC being built as C++03 ? If so, then
doesn't that standard lack stdint.h ?

A quick search shows that GCC "wraps" existing or provides its own
stdint.h for targets if none found.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-04/msg00000.html

So if DJGPP 2.03p2 doesn't have stdint.h, won't it need fixing
wherever the GCC-provided one exists?

- Raw text -